I must really like this book, because this was not my first time reading it. I think that when I was younger I liked it for the excitement of the plot, whereas now I appreciate it for its larger context. It strikes me as very plausible story from a specific time and place in history (end of the 19th century in the U.S. and England). It highlights the way in which the political systems of the two countries determine their cultural differences. The book puts everything I appreciate and take for granted about my own American life into a more precarious state than where I'm used to seeing it. In some ways it seems like a look at the beginning of a cultural revolution. The only objection I have is that it was not completed by Edith Wharton--it was completed after her death based on her outline, but about 30% of the book was not actually written by her. This is not obvious when you read it, but it just doesn't sit quite right.Hilary Hicklin
As is quite often the case, Wharton's later work doesn't quite measure up to her earlier masterpieces, such as Ethan Frome, which is what I would recommend to anyone new to this writer, and being her last (unfinished) novel it lacks the polish of her other books. Marion Mainwaring has done a pretty good job of completing it though. Wharton has fun exposing the petty snobberies of New York society as well as the pointless traditions of the British class system, as when the Dowager Duchess of Tintagel says "What would happen next, as I said to her, in a house where the housekeeper DID take her meals with the upper servants?".This is a story of the clash of the Old World and the New, of marriages of convenience, of infidelities and boredom. But the key character throughout this book, the person who holds the plot together, is Laura Testvalley (or Testavaglia which is her original name) who belongs in neither camp being the daughter of Italian immigrants. An unmarried governess with spirit and allure, she perhaps points to a more independent style of womanhood and provides a contrast to the other female characters in this novel.The story ends on a note of hope and optimism in contrast to other novels by Wharton which end in sadness and despair. Is that the ending she envisaged, or was this tacked on to make the book more appealing to modern readers?علی
"دزدان دریایی"* کنایه از اشغال آمریکا توسط اشرافیت جاه طلب انگلیسی ست. قصه در آستانه ی ظهور طبقه ی "نوکیسه"*ی بورژوا در فتح دنیای اشرافیت زمین دار، اتفاق می افتد. چهار دختر از خانواده های ثروتمند آمریکایی- کارخانه دار، سرمایه دار- برای "فصل لندن" به انگلستان آمده اند، و هر کدام در شکار جوانی انگلیسی از طبقات بالای اجتماعی- اشرافیت - به نوعی "دزدان دریایی" تازه اند که این بار از آن سوی اقیانوس، برای فتح قاره ی کهنه آمده اند. شادابی و سرزندگی دختران آمریکایی اما، در آغوش سرد اشرافیت انگلیسی، یکی بعد از دیگری می پژمرد و دختران در می یابند آنچه درباره ی ثروت و مکنت و جاه و جلال اشرافیت می اندیشیدند، خواب و خیالی بیش نبوده است. یکی از دختران با وجود ادامه ی زندگی با شوهر شرابخواره و سفلیسی اش، لذت زندگی را در آغوش معشوق می چشد، دیگری با زاییدن چند کودک، اندوهبار در ثروت غرق می شود تا جایی که خواهر سرکش اش را هم طرد می کند، سومی دانسته درون قصر و ثروت غوطه می خورد، و با تظاهر به عشق، تابع شوهر و رسم و رسوماتی می شود که دوست ندارد... از میان آنها تنها "آنابلا"ست که با "دوک" ثروتمندی ازدواج می کند، به مقام "دوشس"ی می رسد، اما هم چنان از این که فرمانبرداری ست بیکاره در این شکوه یخ زده، بیزار است، و آرزوی مرگ می کند. تا شبی که در نهایت دلتنگی برای آزادی از دست رفته، مرد دیگری را در بستر شوهرش می بیند. این بهترین بهانه برای گریز از این قفس طلایی، و خزیدن در آغوش عشقی ست که سال ها، دانسته از آن روی گردانده است. مردی که نه مالی دارد و نه جلالی، مهندسی که تنها با "عشق" می خواهد "آنابلا" را به آفریقای جنوبی ببرد، با این امید که زندگی تازه ای را آغاز کنند. و آنابلا، پشت به قصر و جاه و جبروت، دست به دست مرد می دهد که دوستش دارد، تا به پشتیبانی این عشق، زندگی را از صفر آغاز کنند. رمان پر است از اخلاقیات سنتی جامعه ی اشرافی، ازدواج های بدون عشق، رسومی که تنها "وظیفه"ی زن را، وفاداری به مرد، اطاعت از شوهر، و زاییدن می شناسد. گریز آنابلا و جدایی معلمه اش، "گزینش"ی ست سوای آنچه رسوم اجتماعی دیکته می کنند. با رهایی این دو زن از رابطه هایی که دوست ندارند، دو شکاف عمیق بر ستون های این قصر سنگین "گوتیک" حک می شود.* The buccaneers /Upstart, NouveauricheElizabeth (Miss Eliza)
*Special Content only on my blog, Strange and Random Happenstance during Downton Denial (February 2014)Nan doesn't want a governess. Her sister Jinny didn't have to have one, neither did the Elmsworth girls, and the irrepressible Conchita surly never needed one, not that she would have accepted her fate as Nan does. But Nan's mother is convinced that Miss Testvalley will be able to not only help Nan, but get some good British refinement that is lacking in her little American savages and perhaps help as an entree into New York society. But New York society isn't ready for these girls. Conchita makes a match with a third son in a great British family and it gives Miss Testvalley an idea. If New York society is so shocked by these young bloods, why not take them over to England. Give them a season where anything they say or do is unique and alluring compared to the dull English roses the aristocracy is used to.In no time at all the girls are settled into the highest echelons of the British Isles. Jinny is married to Lord Seadown, the Brightlingsea heir and older brother to Conchita's husband. Both the Elmsworth girls, while not in the peerage, make very advantageous marriages monetarily and politically. While Nan surprises everyone and marries Ushant, the Duke of Tintagel, the wealthiest man in England. Yet Nan isn't happy. It becomes clear that her husband married her not for wealth or even for love, but because she was naive as to what a duke was and wasn't hunting for a title, that and her youth makes her malleable. Though the longer she is married to Ushant, the more she realizes that their marriage is a mistake. This realization has nothing to do with the fact that she is falling in love with the young Guy Thwarte. She would be fine if Guy never knew of her love as long as he was happy and she was free once more. Back in the days before DVRs and having anything you could possibly imagine to watch just at the flick of a switch, spending the midnight hours surfing the channels always yielded the most interesting results. On channels like A and E, before they became the home of reality programing, you could often find interesting miniseries airing at anytime of day or night. It was on this channel that I first saw Nathaniel Parker deflate a sheep in Far from the Madding Crowd. I'm not sure what channel it was on that I first stumbled across The Buccaneers, but it was definitely in one of these late night surfing sessions. Much like how I caught Louisa May Alcott's The Inheritance in bits a pieces, it wasn't until years later when it was released on DVD that I got to watch the series in all it's glory. The cast alone is a who's who of British and American actors, from the omnipresent James Frain (seriously, he was recently in Grimm, The White Queen and Sleepy Hollow AT THE SAME TIME), to Greg Wise and Michael Kitchen to Mira Sorvino and Connie Booth. This miniseries had it all, including Castle Howard!At the time I was unaware that the miniseries was based on an incomplete manuscript of Edith Wharton's. I mean, I knew it was Wharton, I just didn't know the she died before she could finish it, much like Elizabeth Gaskell and Wives and Daughters. I do remember stumbling across the "finished" book one day at a used bookstore and picking it up. I mean, seriously, how could I NOT buy it? Firstly, I liked the miniseries, and secondly, well, it had a John Singer Sargeant painting on the cover that happens to belong to the Devonshires. What I didn't know until I was researching the book before I read it was that the miniseries and this specific book have different endings and that both endings are kind of reviled by fans of Wharton. This made me wonder if perhaps I should have read the incomplete manuscript, but then, even knowing that there was no ending, I might get that unexpected sadness that I did when reading Wives and Daughters. Also, having seen the miniseries didn't spoil me for the book. Is the wrong ending maybe acceptable because at least it is an ending? The fact that it ends "happily ever after" is what gets most Wharton fans... it wasn't her style. Edith's MO was more, and everyone is sad, some are dead, there is no striding happily into the sunset. Yet maybe it was this change up that made the book appeal to a wider audience? But what would Wharton herself think? There's a part of me that really wants Martin Scorsese to get his hands on this and come up with a bleaker ending...The problem with a book with two authors writing the same book more then fifty years apart is the question where does Wharton end and Mainwaring begin? To me, there's a complete seismic shift at the beginning of the third section, wherein Nan hijacks the book as the heroine she was always meant to be. The book definitely falters here because until now the focus of the book had been more egalitarian. Nan taking over, while she is our heroine, is unable to shoulder the narrative much as she is unable to shoulder her duties as a duchess. How can we really connect with someone who doesn't know her own mind or even who she is? While humans are more realistic when faced with internal conflict, her conflict combined with her lack of personality made my growing love of the book falter. How can she love that Guy has this connection to his ancestral home yet not see the same connection in her husband? Is this a flaw of Ushants? Or is it a flaw in Nan? Looking to see where Wharton's writing ceased, it appears to be long after these problems start cropping up in the book. Wharton was just roughing it out and because she herself changed the feel and style of the book Mainwaring was never able to get The Buccaneers to rebound and seemed to be so desirous of tying things up quickly that the book ended abruptly and the reader is left with the sad realization that this could have been a true masterpiece if Wharton had lived. While the book does have it's problems because of the situation it was put in because of Wharton's death, the overarching theme of the power of art and literature is captivating to me. The character of Miss Testvalley with her connection to both art and literature through her cousin Dante Gabriel Rossetti, breathes life into the book. The characters that are most alive are those with an appreciation of the beauty of the world. In fact, this might be why Nan loves Guy over Ushant, despite them both having this underlying connection and obligation to their ancestral homes, Ushant views his stewardship as an obligation and a duty, not a privilege bound in love. He never appreciates the art for it's beauty and ability to transport you, he views it as part of the house. It is this ability of beyondness that Nan talks about, this transcendence that can be found in art and literature that made me sit up and say yes! You need to look beyond, you need to expand your horizons to make yourself all that you can be. This is not an insular little world we live in, no matter how hard you might try to make it. Go out and read a book, go to a museum, capture some beauty for yourself and you will maybe find a little happiness, because as Wharton shows us, art is life.Linda
Based on what I know of Wharton's personal life this story is true to her personal life and experiences. And I can't help feeling sorry for her. She writes like this is the way life is and that it is the same way everywhere and cannot be helped or changed. I understand that times were different then and to some degree I can identify with some of the social moires (some of the rules of entering proper society have not changed all that much) However, I think she is was wrong to make us think that happy marriages were the exception rather than the rule back then. She completely leaves out religion and morality at a time when that was still an important part of society no matter what class you were in. I wouldn't say I liked the book but I didn't dislike it either. I see the book being written from the author's own personal experience and I wish she could've seen and experienced a happier life.Madeline
I found a copy of this book in a used bookstore, and hesitated before finally caving and buying it. I loved The Age of Innocence, but (as I learned from reading the book jacket while in the store) The Buccaneers is unfinished. Wharton wrote about 89,000 words of the story before dying in 1937, and Wharton scholar Marion Mainwaring picked up where the book left off and finished the novel. There's a note at the end about how Mainwaring made some changes to Wharton's draft to account for later changes in the story (and she also removed some hella racist language), but for the most part, the first two thirds of the book are primarily Wharton's. I don't like the idea of reading unfinished stories, and I can't decide what irks me more: an unfinished novel like Suite Francaise, which didn't have an ending because Irene Nemirovsky died before she could finish it; or The Buccaneers, where another author is brought in to complete the draft. Either way, it makes for a frustrating experience. That being said, Mainwaring does a pretty good job of continuing Wharton's novel, to the point where I couldn't tell where Wharton's writing ended and Mainwaring's began. Maybe if I was a more experienced Wharton reader I would have noticed discrepancies, but as far as I was concerned, it was a solid story. The story opens in 1876 New York, where "new money" sisters Virginia and Annebel St. George are preparing to find husbands. They find that they can't compete with the old money families of New York, and, after one of their friends marries an English lord who was visiting America, decide to follow her to England. Guided by their British governess, Laura Testvalley, the girls make their mark on the London social scene. Two more American sisters join the St. George girls, and their group becomes known as "the buccaneers," fortune-hunting Americans invading London to snatch up all the eligible lords and dukes. Each of the four American girls ends up marrying into the aristocracy, with varied success. The story wasn't as tightly constructed or engrossing as The Age of Innocence, but I still loved reading Wharton's perspective on the shallowness and complexity of high society in the 1800's. She also makes it clear, without needing to slam it in your face, how much it sucked to be a woman in this world. The two most engrossing characters were Miss Testvalley, a confirmed spinster who's given up all hope of finding a husband and throws herself into the job of finding good marriages for her charges; and Annabel St. George, who ends up making the best marriage and is completely miserable. Her efforts to make the best of her circumstances, knowing that she's completely trapped in this life that she chose, were heartbreaking and beautiful. "To begin with, what had caused Annabel St. George to turn into Annabel Tintagel? That was the central problem! Yet how could she solve it, when she could no longer question that elusive Annabel St. George, who was still so near to her, yet as remote and unapproachable as a plaintive ghost?Yes - a ghost. That was it. Annabel St. George was dead, and would therefore never be able to find out why and how that mysterious change had come about. ...'The greatest mistake,' she mused, her chin resting on her clasped hands, her eyes fixed unseeingly on the dim reaches of the park, 'the greatest mistake is to think that we ever know why we do things. ...I suppose the nearest we can ever come to it is by getting what old people call "experience." But by the time we've got that were no longer the person who did the things we no longer understand. The trouble is, I suppose, that we change every moment; and the things we did stay."Ellen B.
Less echoingly sad than The Age of Innocence, which is my... most thorough experience with Edith Wharton, having been read for an American Literature course in college and less sad than my vague memories of Ethan Frome, but it doesn't really change my impression of her work as "beautifully written books about rich people being sad."The part that I had the most difficultly with in this book were the sudden, unannounced time jumps. The chapter changes and it's two years later and oh, these characters are married now with nothing said of their courtship, marriage, or early married life apart from what comes through later in recollection. Now, with a story spanning several years like this, I can see that happening, but it still threw me off kilter.And I guess I have to say something about the fact that it was finished by another. I didn't notice, as some did, the exact point where Mainwaring took over and finished the uncompleted manuscript (and the fact that it was an unfinished first draft may have something to do with the jarring nature of those time jumps), but I could feel it in the tone the deeper I got into the last third of the novel. (To be a little snarky about it, it was that people were having emotions other than echoing emptiness and regret and impossible love.)Long story short, I enjoyed it and I'm glad that it was our first pick for the Hairpin Bookclub.Dawn
The synopsis for this 1938 edition for The Buccaneers (appearing above) is completely wrong! Who wrote that?! No swashbuckling pirates, here! Edith Wharton's "novel" was published as a lightly edited, incomplete manuscript in the year following her death. It was sure to have been her masterpiece!The "Buccaneers" are 5 nouveau riche American girls who, steered by an English-Italian (cousin to artist/poet D.G. Rosetti) governess, "invade" the Bristish peerage in the 'seventies (1870's).While later editions append with an ending written by a Wharton scholar, I am charmed that my local libray is still circulating this original 1938 edition! There is no ending; it's a cliffhanger prematurely left off amidst a failing marriage and budding romance. So why 5 stars??The writing is superb. The British landscape is beautifully elaborated, in watercolor tones. The subject is fascinating: courtships spanning the improbable social/cultural divide between American upstarts and British aristocrats. And then there's the novelty of reading an unfinished work. The editor insists that Ms. Wharton was not finished developing several of her characters. The contrast between her well-developed characters and the more-transparent ones helps a modern reader appreciate qualities of "classic" literature. I universally recommend this forgotten masterpiece. I'm still deciding if I'll read the "finished" edition, as this one was surprisingly satisfying even in it's incompletion.Eliza
Ce roman riche et foisonnant reprend le thème très prisé par Henry James de la rencontre entre la nouvelle Amérique et la vieille Europe. Cette opposition est encore renforcée par le choix de personnages féminins pour les Américains et de personnages presque exclusivement masculins pour les Anglais. Edith Wharton ne s’intéresse d’ailleurs que peu aux hommes dans ce récit, excepté les Thwarte, père et fils, confidents et amis respectifs de Miss Testvalley et d’Annabelle. Le roman se divise en quatre parties, chacune distante des autres de quelques années. On suit donc l’évolution de ces cinq jeunes filles pendant une période assez longue, qui permet à l’auteur de nous décrire la suite de ces mariages. La rigidité des règles de la vie sociale constituent cette fois encore le ciment de l’histoire. Qu’il s’agisse de faire son entrée dans le monde, d’être courtisée ou bien encore de son comportement avec son mari, les héroïnes sont sans cesse confrontées à ce qu’elles devraient faire ou à la façon dont elles devraient agir, en vertu de règles ancestrales établies par la bonne société. Leur nationalité leur confère un statut d’étrangères qui les rend très hermétiques à ce code de bonne conduite. Cette excuse permet à Edith Wharton de montrer combien ces règles peuvent s’avérer nocives pour l’épanouissement d’un caractère fragile et irréconciliables avec la violence des sentiments à laquelle nous pouvons tous être confrontés. Chez Edith Wharton, il semblerait bien que la complexité de la vie se reflète dans les destins souvent tragiques de ses héroïnes. Pourtant, le destin des Boucanières est bien moins dramatique que celui de Lily Bart dans Chez les heureux du monde. Toutes ne connaîtront pas la déception d’Annabelle et la fin du roman nous offre quelques beaux exemples d’entente conjugale.Ce roman a été plus qu’un coup de cœur : il entre sans conteste dans la short-list de mes romans préférés. Bruissement de robes, propos frivoles et éclats de rire en cascade ne parviennent pas à masquer la révolte d’Edith Wharton face à un monde corseté dans lequel elle ne s’est jamais retrouvée. La richesse de ce roman, l’exubérance de ses personnages et la palette des émotions qui s’y déploient, sous la plume claire et élégante de l’auteur, en font un moment de lecture incomparable.Linda Grant
American Royalty would not except the novo Reich St Gorges and Elmsworths. So they had to travel to England to see if they could find an alternative to the American royalty they sought acceptance to society through. England offered an new society for Virginia, Nan, Lizzie and Conchita to blossom and grow. It also offered them an expectable place to find husbands. All the girls enter into marriages that turn them into the societal socialites that they sought to be in American. However, these marriages make some of them fell trapped and suffocated. We also find out that some of the marriages where made with money in mind. Sometimes and English Lord can be as penniless as a pauper but hide the fact with the goodness of his name and title. This unfortunately happens to many of the gilrs and is not found out by them until they are irreparably married.Nan St Gorge finds that her marriage to the Duke of Tintigal is not what she really wanted and that she might not be cut out for English society. The intricacies of English society seem to be a constant unhappiness to her combined with her difficult marriage. All these factors result in her turning to her long ago love Guy Thwarte. This love grows and allows Nan a way to escape her difficult marriage. The other girls find similar matches but all seem to come up again the English social mores and standards that have suffocated Nan. However, most do find happiness in there own way through the tolerance of English high societal life. Lizzie Elmsworth seem to come out the best with her marriage to Hector Robinson. Her marriage seems to be the democratic romantic stage that the other girls sough when they first set out from America.RunRachelRun
Oh my God, if someone could resurrect the dead and had enough magic potion for one person, I would choose Madame Wharton. It devastates me that even if I visit the "W" shelf at the library a million times over, as if I were a pilgrim visiting a holy shrine, on my bleeding and torn knees, there will never be a new Wharton book propped there for me to read for the very first time. I guess I should be grateful that there are authors out there who inspire such devotion, dead or otherwise.Rose
Did Edith Wharton really intend to write a happy ending to this novel's marriage plot? If so, it was unlike her, and she passed away with a third of the book unfinished. The novel's title,The Buccaneers, refers to young, rich American women who upset Victorian social conventions and conquered the English nobility (Downton Abbey, the prequel)with their beauty and sex-appeal. The ultimate heroine is a woman strong enough to simply walk away from all the spoils she's won. True love does come at the cost of social acceptance, and that's quite a price to pay, The Buccaneers being nothing if not a social novel, but it's also the most spiritually positive of Edith Wharton's books, and her co-author or finisher, Marion Mainwaring, almost pulls it off as well. However, in true Wharton fashion, the novel ends, not on a note of romantic fulfillment but one of disappointment. A young woman's happiness results in heartbreak for a plucky, intelligent, and tireless governess. Convention provides no warm spot by the fire for her.Linda Grant
American Royalty would not except the novo Reich St Gorges and Elmsworths. So they had to travel to England to see if they could find an alternative to the American royalty they sought acceptance to society through.England offered an new society for Virginia, Nan, Lizzie and Conchita to blossom and grow. It also offered them an expectable place to find husbands. All the girls enter into marriages that turn them into the societal socialites that they sought to be in American. However, these marriages make some of them fell trapped and suffocated.Nan St Gorge finds that her marriage to the Duke of Tintigal is not what she really wanted and that she might not be cut out for English society. The intricacies of English society seem to be a constant unhappiness to her combined with her difficult marriage. All these factors result in her turning to her long ago love Guy Thwarte. This love grows and allows Nan a way to escape her difficult marriage.The other girls find similar matches but all seem to come up again the English social mores and standards that have suffocated Nan. However, most do find happiness in there own way through the tolerance of English high societal life. Lizzie Elmsworth seem to come out the best with her marriage to Hector Robinson. Her marriage seems to be the democratic romantic stage that the other girls sough when they first set out from America.Andie
** spoiler alert ** Well...I liked it and I didn't. I've been a huge fan of the movie and love examining the different marriage relationships. I enjoyed very much learning MORE about Annabel and Conchita, and they have remained my favorite characters. However, I'm sad that in the book Annabel simply seemed to get bored with being a duchess, and seemed to lose all her passion for life, whereas in the movie she was raped and abused by her husband. There was only one threat in the book about using force, but other than that it did not exist. I just don't know what to make of it all, now that it is done. I also feel like the book just sort of ended. There was a whole plot that had practically just started when the book ended. What happened to the rest of the characters? Did the re-marriage plan go through? Did Lady Churt get her just desserts? What about Lord Britlingsea? Did he die?Susan Andersen
One of my most favorite books ever, and I am on my third time re-reading it. This is Edith Wharton's unfinished masterpiece, chronicling the adventures of American heiresses conquering the impoverished social upper crust in the London of the Gilded Age. Completed masterfully by Wharton scholar Marion Mainwaring, using Wharton's notes, the book weaves history, period literature, and brilliant characters into a tale that delves deeply into the true meaning -- and cost -- of happiness. If you only read one book by Edith Wharton, this is the one.